
- Image via Wikipedia
The plot thickens (just from yesterday!).
So I woke up this morning determined to come to terms with this whole glycemic indexing thing. I mean, it can’t be THAT complicated can it? Actually, yes. It can. And it is. I am determined to find a way to duplicate this theory into a simple to understand process! To start off with, there are several components to this equation. First, not only do you have to consider the glycemic index (GI) (remember the espresso?) but you also have to take into account the “glycemic load” (GL). So, just to recap – the glycemic index of a food is just a number that tells you how it will affect your blood sugar – big number, big spike, low number, low rise. Bigger is not better here.
Glycemic load is another number (like glycemic index) but this number measures how much of the sugar accounted for in the GI is in an average serving of that particular food. The example I read used watermelon to illustrate this point. Watermelon has a GI of 76 (quite high) that made me think “YIKES!!” but the sugar that causes the high GI number is very diluted in the watermelon – it has a very low glycemic load (like, 4) so you can eat quite a lot of watermelon without having the effect of the blood sugar spike you might anticipate with the high GI.
Also, the GI & GL of one food can be offset by the GI & GL of other foods you’re eating at the same time. And I thought counting calories was tricky!! Overall, I ended up realizing that the food I’m eating for my body type is right in line with all this GI/GL stuff. I’m really glad that at least now I know what these terms mean, but I’m even more grateful that I don’t have to spend my day (and my sanity) trying to keep track of what GI level this is in comparison with the GL level of that relative to the portion size and whether or not the moon is in Virgo. I have enough to keep track of. Where are my car keys?



About Monica Cardone